Banner image placeholder
Banner image

Laryngeal Aerodynamics, Acoustics, and Hypernasality in Children With Cleft Palate.


Journal article


Robert Brinton Fujiki, John H Munday, Rebecca Johnson, Susan L. Thibeault
Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research, 2025

Semantic Scholar DOI PubMed
Cite

Cite

APA   Click to copy
Fujiki, R. B., Munday, J. H., Johnson, R., & Thibeault, S. L. (2025). Laryngeal Aerodynamics, Acoustics, and Hypernasality in Children With Cleft Palate. Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research.


Chicago/Turabian   Click to copy
Fujiki, Robert Brinton, John H Munday, Rebecca Johnson, and Susan L. Thibeault. “Laryngeal Aerodynamics, Acoustics, and Hypernasality in Children With Cleft Palate.” Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research (2025).


MLA   Click to copy
Fujiki, Robert Brinton, et al. “Laryngeal Aerodynamics, Acoustics, and Hypernasality in Children With Cleft Palate.” Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research, 2025.


BibTeX   Click to copy

@article{robert2025a,
  title = {Laryngeal Aerodynamics, Acoustics, and Hypernasality in Children With Cleft Palate.},
  year = {2025},
  journal = {Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research},
  author = {Fujiki, Robert Brinton and Munday, John H and Johnson, Rebecca and Thibeault, Susan L.}
}

Abstract

OBJECTIVE The objective of this study was to examine the relationship between laryngeal aerodynamics, acoustics, and hypernasality in children with cleft palate with or without lip (CP ± L).

METHOD This study used a prospectively performed cross-sectional design. Fifty-six children between the ages of 6 and 17 years with CP ± L participated (Mage= 11.7, SD = 3.4; male = 32, female = 24). Children were separated into four groups based on auditory-perceptual ratings of hypernasality made using the Cleft Audit Protocol for Speech-Augmented-Americleft Modification protocol. Laryngeal aerodynamic measures including subglottal pressure, transglottal airflow, laryngeal aerodynamic resistance (LAR), and phonation threshold pressure were collected. Acoustic measures of smoothed cepstral peak prominence (CPP) and low-to-high ratio on sustained vowels and connected speech were also considered. Analyses controlled for age, sex, auditory-perceptual ratings of voice quality, and speech intelligibility.

RESULTS Children with minimally or mildly hypernasal resonance demonstrated significantly increased subglottal pressure, reduced transglottal airflow, and increased LAR, when compared with children with balanced or moderately hypernasal resonance. CPP on sustained vowel was significantly lower for children with moderate hypernasality when compared with all other groups-suggesting poorer voice quality. Other acoustic measures were in or near normative pediatric range.

CONCLUSIONS Children with CP ± L and minimal or mildly hypernasal resonance demonstrated aerodynamic voice measures indicative of vocal hyperfunction. These findings suggest that children with CP ± L may compensate for velopharyngeal dysfunction on a laryngeal level, thus increasing the risk of laryngeal pathology. Future study should explore the relationship between laryngeal function and velopharyngeal port closure and consider how voice problems can be prevented or mitigated in children with CP ± L.


Share

Translate to