Banner image placeholder
Banner image

Instrumental Voice Evaluation in Children: What Are We Getting?


Journal article


Robert Brinton Fujiki, Anumitha Venkatraman, R. Godbout, Susan L. Thibeault
American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 2025

Semantic Scholar DOI PubMed
Cite

Cite

APA   Click to copy
Fujiki, R. B., Venkatraman, A., Godbout, R., & Thibeault, S. L. (2025). Instrumental Voice Evaluation in Children: What Are We Getting? American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology.


Chicago/Turabian   Click to copy
Fujiki, Robert Brinton, Anumitha Venkatraman, R. Godbout, and Susan L. Thibeault. “Instrumental Voice Evaluation in Children: What Are We Getting?” American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology (2025).


MLA   Click to copy
Fujiki, Robert Brinton, et al. “Instrumental Voice Evaluation in Children: What Are We Getting?” American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 2025.


BibTeX   Click to copy

@article{robert2025a,
  title = {Instrumental Voice Evaluation in Children: What Are We Getting?},
  year = {2025},
  journal = {American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology},
  author = {Fujiki, Robert Brinton and Venkatraman, Anumitha and Godbout, R. and Thibeault, Susan L.}
}

Abstract

PURPOSE The aim of this study was to determine the age at which children with voice disorders can complete videostroboscopy, acoustic, and aerodynamic voice assessments. Factors predicting videostroboscopy tolerance were examined.

METHOD A retrospective observational cohort design was used. Three hundred twelve children with voice disorders were divided into the following age groups: 3-4, 5-6, 7-9, 10-12, and 13-17 years. Videostroboscopy was considered complete if patients produced enough phonation during the exam to allow for stroboscopic ratings of vocal fold oscillation (i.e., mucosal wave, amplitude) to be performed. Patient demographics, voice-related diagnoses, voice symptoms, vocal fold oscillation ratings, clinician experience level, and acoustic and aerodynamic voice measures were collected from the medical record.

RESULTS All children tolerated laryngeal imaging under steady-state halogen light. Almost 17% of 3- to 4-year-olds tolerated videostroboscopy. This number significantly increased to 55% in 5- to 6-year-olds (p < .01) and to 60% in 7- to 9-year-olds. Success rates again significantly increased to 85% in 10- to 12-year-olds (p < .01) and 93.1% in children ≥ 13 years old. Age (p = .03) and ability to perform the voice range profile (p < .01) and aerodynamic voice assessment (p < .01) tasks significantly predicted which patients could tolerate videostroboscopy. Half of 3- to 4-year-old children produced sustained phonation for acoustic analyses compared to 91.7% of 5- to 6-year-olds (p < .01). The majority of children ≥ 5 years old completed the voice range profile task (63.3%) and aerodynamic voice assessments (66.7%).

CONCLUSIONS Videostroboscopy is viable for young children with voice disorders. The ability to complete aerodynamic and voice range profile tasks may serve as a preliminary indicator of how well a patient will tolerate videostroboscopy. Future prospective study may determine the most effective approach to help children tolerate instrumental voice assessments.


Share

Translate to